Giorgio Napolitano that the signing of the infamous decree of interpretation which was submitted by Mr Berlusconi has been at least a reckless act is a fact well recognized.
The authoritative is yet another confirmation came from the fact that the TAR of Lazio rejected the suspension requested by the PDL to allow the readmission of own list, drawn up largely out of time.
The reason given by the administrative courts leaves no room for doubt: the government could not intervene on a matter, the regional electoral law, the responsibility of the region and is also in the minutes of the police officers in the office of the Electoral Court of Appeal of Rome it is written that at 12 there were only 4 delegates list, and of these was not the delegate of the appellant. Speech closed.
Today Repubblica.it reported the statement to his former deputy president Massimo Giannini Ciampi, to which the title is made to say: "And 'the massacre of the institutions / time protect the Quirinale.
Apparently a stance in defense of Carlo Azeglio Ciampi of his successor.
The authoritative is yet another confirmation came from the fact that the TAR of Lazio rejected the suspension requested by the PDL to allow the readmission of own list, drawn up largely out of time.
The reason given by the administrative courts leaves no room for doubt: the government could not intervene on a matter, the regional electoral law, the responsibility of the region and is also in the minutes of the police officers in the office of the Electoral Court of Appeal of Rome it is written that at 12 there were only 4 delegates list, and of these was not the delegate of the appellant. Speech closed.
Today Repubblica.it reported the statement to his former deputy president Massimo Giannini Ciampi, to which the title is made to say: "And 'the massacre of the institutions / time protect the Quirinale.
Apparently a stance in defense of Carlo Azeglio Ciampi of his successor.
But as more and more often the case with the newspaper's Independence Square, the title is misleading.
Just read a short excerpt of ' article to realize this. At
doubt advanced by the journalist if Napolitano could not authorize the presentation of the decree of the government, so the former head of state answers:
"I never like to judge hypothetical periods of unreality. At the same time, I find it wrong to say Now "I would have done, I would have said ...". Everybody decides according to their sensitivity and in accordance with the needs dictated by the moment. Napolitano has decided. Now, what's done is done. I repeat: this point has been embarked on a road, and we just hope that leads us to a positive result
...". What about the criticism that roar from the neck to the network against possible impeachment proposed by Antonio Di Pietro? Ciampi blurted
"But what is the point now, shooting on the headquarters? At the point where we are, is not in the interests of all the controversy over the Quirinale, and if anything, even more efforts to protect the highest institution of the country ...".
Translation: now that's done is done! is no use crying over spilled milk.
But the words of President Ciampi, who evidently has no intention of opening a quarrel with his successor, it is rather easy to decipher: he would not sign, but since that Napolitano has done, is useless if not counterproductive to reproach him. The
want to call an authoritative distancing?
If this is not a repudiation little ... we are missing!
Just read a short excerpt of ' article to realize this. At
doubt advanced by the journalist if Napolitano could not authorize the presentation of the decree of the government, so the former head of state answers:
"I never like to judge hypothetical periods of unreality. At the same time, I find it wrong to say Now "I would have done, I would have said ...". Everybody decides according to their sensitivity and in accordance with the needs dictated by the moment. Napolitano has decided. Now, what's done is done. I repeat: this point has been embarked on a road, and we just hope that leads us to a positive result
...". What about the criticism that roar from the neck to the network against possible impeachment proposed by Antonio Di Pietro? Ciampi blurted
"But what is the point now, shooting on the headquarters? At the point where we are, is not in the interests of all the controversy over the Quirinale, and if anything, even more efforts to protect the highest institution of the country ...".
Translation: now that's done is done! is no use crying over spilled milk.
But the words of President Ciampi, who evidently has no intention of opening a quarrel with his successor, it is rather easy to decipher: he would not sign, but since that Napolitano has done, is useless if not counterproductive to reproach him. The
want to call an authoritative distancing?
If this is not a repudiation little ... we are missing!
0 comments:
Post a Comment