that even the President of the Republic has joined the chorus of outrageous attempt to rehabilitate Craxi forcing it to Father of the Nation, martyr Italian justice, forced into exile by merciless judges, it is just too much.
Why are we talking about a person sentenced for crimes in final form sure outrageous for anyone, even more so for those who held the post of prime minister for nearly four years. Therefore the speech
Giorgio Napolitano is in letter sent to the widow of the Socialist leader, is playing out of tune and objectively very inappropriate and, worse, ambiguous.
But it is always said that the President should have a role impartial and must represent the entire national community? How
Giorgio Napolitano represents all the Italians in the field if it falls on a topic so controversial with an intervention politically deplorable, symbolically seizing the occasion of its tenth anniversary Craxi, for outside assessments that, if it is free interpreter as a private citizen, should mark distance as a tenant of the Quirinal?
What are you saying on this occasion as President of the Republic even tends to emphasize, if not there had never noticed:
"For the army that function at the top of the state, I ask myself, dear Lord, from one point of view of the republican institutions, which suggests to grasp the opportunity of a recurrence charge - as a painful personal memories - various and controversial historical significance to foster a more peaceful and shared view of the difficult path of democracy in the first half-century Italian repubblicano.E 'was part of that journey the outbreak of the crisis of the party system that had held up to the early 90 the conduct of political discourse and government under the Constitution. And it was part of the succession, in a dramatic two-year period of investigations and judicial processes, which led, among other things, a dual all'incriminazione and final sentencing in criminal Mr. Craxi, former prime minister from 1983 to 1987. Until the epilogue, whose memory is still cause for anxiety, illness and death in solitude, far from Italy, the former prime minister, after he decided to leave the country while they were still in full swing processes proceedings against him. "
And the Italians were extortionists from the policy of Craxi and other protagonists of Tangentopoli and who find themselves still a huge public debt, on account of what are now two decades (from famous financial 100,000 Amato billion in 1992), which pull the belt waiting for a dawn that never comes, those who represent them? Not sure Giorgio Napolitano. Bad
also recall that he makes to the investigation from the pool of Milan, passing Craxi as the scapegoat for a machine that would have infringed judicial blinded to the principle of the right to a fair trial and that he would fiercely with him with "a toughness unmatched."
"But it was in full swing for months already extensive investigation launched by the Milan prosecutor's office and others. And by all the parties and their leaders had not come quickly a full recognition of the common deformities to be corrected, nor a subsequent turning point in terms of renewing standards, rules and customs. In that political vacuum found, increasingly, space, media support and consensus prosecution, resulting in a sudden shift in balance in the relationship between politics and justice. Mr. Craxi, who resigned as secretary of the PSI, was hit by multiple allegations of crime. Without questioning the outcome of proceedings relating to him, the fact is that the weight of responsibility for degenerative admitted and reported in general terms and politicians from the Socialist leader had fallen harshly on his person without equal. Nor can however be forgotten that the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg - examining the action against one of the final judgments of conviction of Mr. Craxi - considered by decision of 2002 that, while respecting the Italian rules then in force, had been violated "the right to a fair trial" for one of the aspects covered by the Convention. "
's biographer Eugenio Scalfari not miss an opportunity to sanctify the President Napolitano in this ugly yet another mishap, with his smug look convoluted verbal letter to justify this reckless, all geared to describe the positive aspects of the socialist leader, and almost ignores the misdeeds of Tangentopoli, drawing pietas ".
does not realize that in this way, speaking of an act taken by the Head of State, even bordering on the ridiculous.
" The letter is wide and can be divided into two parts: the first deals with the policy of Craxi in the three-year presidency of the Council and the other, much more brief, the phase which has been dubbed "Tangentopoli." The different attention given to the two arguments is fully understandable: they wanted to commemorate in this letter and give priority to positive and negative only graze but could not be silenced. Although this approach taken by our President is fully acceptable part of a "pietas" which is not only a private virtues but a constitutive element of a democracy where coexist different assessments and sometimes not shared or shareable, which the pietas suffuses a virtuous tolerance. "
These pompous words Scalfari can at most give rise to laughter and make us understand that moral degradation has reached the point of our ruling class.
no surprise for former Republic of if its founder, after he tried to climb on mirrors arguing that the public piety is not the oblivion, so I conclude the pleading to protect the tenant of the Hill:
"That said, you go ahead to place names in the municipalities in their free power to decide payable want to Craxi squares and gardens. "
We're talking about a convict on the run, a satrap policy that, for one thing, spending just 100 million per month to fund the broadcaster of his friend which was among other many other important gifts.
How to President Napolitano, after disappointing the thousands of sorties, we look forward serenely the expiry of his mandate.
Why are we talking about a person sentenced for crimes in final form sure outrageous for anyone, even more so for those who held the post of prime minister for nearly four years. Therefore the speech
Giorgio Napolitano is in letter sent to the widow of the Socialist leader, is playing out of tune and objectively very inappropriate and, worse, ambiguous.
But it is always said that the President should have a role impartial and must represent the entire national community? How
Giorgio Napolitano represents all the Italians in the field if it falls on a topic so controversial with an intervention politically deplorable, symbolically seizing the occasion of its tenth anniversary Craxi, for outside assessments that, if it is free interpreter as a private citizen, should mark distance as a tenant of the Quirinal?
What are you saying on this occasion as President of the Republic even tends to emphasize, if not there had never noticed:
"For the army that function at the top of the state, I ask myself, dear Lord, from one point of view of the republican institutions, which suggests to grasp the opportunity of a recurrence charge - as a painful personal memories - various and controversial historical significance to foster a more peaceful and shared view of the difficult path of democracy in the first half-century Italian repubblicano.E 'was part of that journey the outbreak of the crisis of the party system that had held up to the early 90 the conduct of political discourse and government under the Constitution. And it was part of the succession, in a dramatic two-year period of investigations and judicial processes, which led, among other things, a dual all'incriminazione and final sentencing in criminal Mr. Craxi, former prime minister from 1983 to 1987. Until the epilogue, whose memory is still cause for anxiety, illness and death in solitude, far from Italy, the former prime minister, after he decided to leave the country while they were still in full swing processes proceedings against him. "
And the Italians were extortionists from the policy of Craxi and other protagonists of Tangentopoli and who find themselves still a huge public debt, on account of what are now two decades (from famous financial 100,000 Amato billion in 1992), which pull the belt waiting for a dawn that never comes, those who represent them? Not sure Giorgio Napolitano. Bad
also recall that he makes to the investigation from the pool of Milan, passing Craxi as the scapegoat for a machine that would have infringed judicial blinded to the principle of the right to a fair trial and that he would fiercely with him with "a toughness unmatched."
"But it was in full swing for months already extensive investigation launched by the Milan prosecutor's office and others. And by all the parties and their leaders had not come quickly a full recognition of the common deformities to be corrected, nor a subsequent turning point in terms of renewing standards, rules and customs. In that political vacuum found, increasingly, space, media support and consensus prosecution, resulting in a sudden shift in balance in the relationship between politics and justice. Mr. Craxi, who resigned as secretary of the PSI, was hit by multiple allegations of crime. Without questioning the outcome of proceedings relating to him, the fact is that the weight of responsibility for degenerative admitted and reported in general terms and politicians from the Socialist leader had fallen harshly on his person without equal. Nor can however be forgotten that the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg - examining the action against one of the final judgments of conviction of Mr. Craxi - considered by decision of 2002 that, while respecting the Italian rules then in force, had been violated "the right to a fair trial" for one of the aspects covered by the Convention. "
's biographer Eugenio Scalfari not miss an opportunity to sanctify the President Napolitano in this ugly yet another mishap, with his smug look convoluted verbal letter to justify this reckless, all geared to describe the positive aspects of the socialist leader, and almost ignores the misdeeds of Tangentopoli, drawing pietas ".
does not realize that in this way, speaking of an act taken by the Head of State, even bordering on the ridiculous.
" The letter is wide and can be divided into two parts: the first deals with the policy of Craxi in the three-year presidency of the Council and the other, much more brief, the phase which has been dubbed "Tangentopoli." The different attention given to the two arguments is fully understandable: they wanted to commemorate in this letter and give priority to positive and negative only graze but could not be silenced. Although this approach taken by our President is fully acceptable part of a "pietas" which is not only a private virtues but a constitutive element of a democracy where coexist different assessments and sometimes not shared or shareable, which the pietas suffuses a virtuous tolerance. "
These pompous words Scalfari can at most give rise to laughter and make us understand that moral degradation has reached the point of our ruling class.
no surprise for former Republic of if its founder, after he tried to climb on mirrors arguing that the public piety is not the oblivion, so I conclude the pleading to protect the tenant of the Hill:
"That said, you go ahead to place names in the municipalities in their free power to decide payable want to Craxi squares and gardens. "
We're talking about a convict on the run, a satrap policy that, for one thing, spending just 100 million per month to fund the broadcaster of his friend which was among other many other important gifts.
How to President Napolitano, after disappointing the thousands of sorties, we look forward serenely the expiry of his mandate.
0 comments:
Post a Comment